In August of 2008, I began training to take over
the responsibilities of another person working in Utah. Over the course
of that experience, and in the months that followed, she and I became
friends. For my birthday that year, she sent
me a book she said had really helped her spiritually. It would do the
same for me.
The book was part one of the trilogy Conversations With God by Neale Donald Walsch. On the surface, a book in which the
author claims to have actual conversations with God might sound like a
delusional journey into hallucination or even
schizophrenia. But something about the book resonated with me, and
things that had made little sense before became clearer.
I got so much out of Part One, that I went on to
read the remaining volumes in the trilogy. Part One is an intimate,
one-on-one “conversation” with God focused mainly on the spirituality of
the individual. Each succeeding volume broadens
its scope and builds on the messages of the first. I later added
another of the author’s books, one which helped me through the
transition when I was laid off from that same job five years later.
As I read through the Conversations With God
series, I began to get a better sense of what I felt and believed about
God, about religion, and about spirituality. At about the same time, I
rediscovered my love of camping or, at this stage
of my life, RVing, and reconnected with the outdoors. The convergence
of these things have helped me to develop a sense of what I believe.
I came to realize that, for me, a single church or
even religion was too confining because each, while including some
things and people, is in its own way built on its exclusiveness. You
became Catholic or Jewish or Baptist, adopting the
practices and beliefs of that religion and excluding or dismissing all
others. To me, God is much bigger and much more inclusive that any
single religion, even bigger and more inclusive than Christianity
itself.
At the same time, my wife was undertaking her own
re-evaluation, helped along through a revisiting of the teachings of the
late Jesuit priest Anthony DeMello. As a result, I think we both ended
up in much the same place in terms of what
we believe.
So what do I believe? I’m still working that out, but my beliefs tend toward what is expressed in this Hindu saying:
"There are hundreds of paths up the mountain, all leading in the same
direction, so it doesn’t
matter which path you take. The only one wasting time is the one who
runs around and around the mountain, telling everyone else that their
path is wrong."
I believe there are many ways to
find God, to experience God, to worship God, none better or worse than
another. In the same way, I believe each religion and its corresponding
holy text contains God’s truth, expressed
in the way that makes sense to the culture in which that religion is
practiced and the time frame in which that religion initially developed.
Just as many different faiths, many far removed from Christianity, have
their own versions of the Great Flood story,
so too do many faiths have their own way of experiencing the divine,
none of them better or more correct than any other.
I think perhaps the Founding Fathers
and the authors of the U.S. Constitution had some sense of this idea.
The First Amendment certainly expresses this notion when it states that
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ...."
Thomas Jefferson also seemed to follow the same lines when he wrote in 1802 that “religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his god, that he owes account to none
other for his faith or his worship …”
As Jefferson infers,
religion, faith, and spirituality are ultimately individual affairs.
Belonging to a church or an organized religion may help some feel a
sense of belonging, but it should not
serve to exclude others because their church, their religion, their
faith is different. For me, church and religion are too confining. I
find God much bigger than that and find I am closest to God when I am
closest to Nature, closest to creation itself.
As I wrote earlier, I
believe God’s truth can be found in the texts of multiple faiths. (I
do not capitalize truth here as many religious writers do because I
believe no one text has a monopoly
on that truth.) Because of that, I hope to spend time in the coming
year reading some of those texts or at least parts of those texts. I
suspect I will find, as many before me have done, that there will be
more similarities than differences. If I am right,
then there may indeed be hope for the future, and hope is itself an
expression of faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment