Technology is a beautiful thing –
when it works. When it doesn’t, people are inconvenienced, businesses
lose money, lives are disrupted.
A recent and minor change in the office where I
work brought that notion home to me. The change – a simple battery –
caused us to be without access to our internal computer network as well
as the external computing world for about 30 minutes.
No opening files from remote locations, no sending or receiving e-mails,
no surfing on the internet and, because we have internet phones (voIP
or voice over Internet Protocol), no incoming or outgoing phone calls.
Once the battery was replaced, regaining access was
simply a matter of restarting our computers, reopening our e-mail
programs and web browsers, and picking up where we left off. Except for
phone calls, that is. This seems to be a problem
every time there is some sort of change to our computer network, only no
one seems to know where the reset button is for the phones (if there
even is one).
Technology is a double-edged sword. It frees us and
ensnares us. Thanks to technology, medical and scientific procedures
and advances once unthinkable become commonplace. We can map the human
genetic sequence and turn once major surgical
procedures into outpatient surgeries with small or no scars. At the same
time, a computer failure can cause large parts of a major city to lose
power or potentially cause a nuclear missile to begin a pre-launch sequence. Because
so many of us use e-mail, Facebook, and
Twitter to communicate with friends, family, and associates, a
technological failure can also cause us to lose touch with the world
around us, albeit temporarily.
As I sit and wait for the telephones at work to
resume functionality, I am struck by the thought that most if not all of
us would be lost and completely unable to function in a world without
the technology we take for granted. While our 18th and 19th-century ancestors were largely
independent and self-sufficient, we are largely dependent (the
objections of some notwithstanding) on one another and upon our
economies of scale. Such changes are more efficient and perhaps
make life easier, but disruptions are more noticeable and create more
inconvenience on a larger scale.
Although they are never mentioned as part of the
argument, I suspect such potential pitfalls lend credence to the
suggestion (even argument) that each of us needs to occasionally unplug
and disconnect from our electronic lives and plug
into and connect with the physical world around us. Our e-lives allow us
to reconnect with people and places we might otherwise lose touch with,
but they are no substitute for the world that exists all around us. As
The Police sang in their 1981 song, “we
are spirits in the material world.”
No comments:
Post a Comment